“I enjoy operating between
representation and abstraction,
creating conditions where you don’t really know what you’re looking at.”
James Welling
creating conditions where you don’t really know what you’re looking at.”
James Welling
If you’re thinking
about looking at images produced by the American photographer James Welling you would be well advised to
have some time at your disposal. For his works are not quick studies, they bring
together many lines of thought that need to be contemplated to decode their
many layers.
As he told Afterall’s
Anthony Spira “The idea of coming into recognition, slowly understanding what
you’re looking at, is important to me. This is one of the reasons that I like
to make images that have multiple meanings. I prefer to make images that are
not pictures of the world, that are not street photographs and have no simple
reading. You have to work to provide the meaning of the photograph.”
As a teenager he was introduced to modern art indirectly through his father.
About which
he told Art
in America’s Steel Stillman “My father worked for a printing company that
did projects for the Whitney Museum. In fact, a catalog that my father’s firm
printed for a 20th Century survey exhibition at the Whitney was my
first exposure to modern art.”
It was in
his mid-teens that Welling started to take art seriously making paintings
inspired by Andrew Wyeth and Edward Hopper. Reading publications such as
Newsweek and Art Forum introduced Welling to contemporary art. Whilst studying
at the California Institute of the Arts he took up
video and in his early twenties taught himself the intricacies of still
photography.
And it is photography that
has engaged him for the last 40 odd years. Making works that range from Polaroids to gelatin silver prints, from photograms to digital prints,
Welling’s diverse subject matter includes tin foil, handwriting, drapery,
gelatin, railroads, buildings, European cities and factories, his front yard
and landscapes from his childhood, all layered with history and ambiguity.
In the early years of this century Welling started to
work digitally and in 2007 his architectural digital photographs were printed
in the New York Magazine.
About which he has said “I’d already photographed Mies
van der Rohe’s Farnsworth House when I approached [the] New York magazine about
photographing Phillip Johnston’s Glass House, which was soon to open to the
public. Most of the images that appeared in New York [in the May 13, 2007
issue] were made on my second visit there – when I decided to work digitally,
in order to move more easily and to see the results more quickly than I could
with film. At that point I became hooked and went back as often as I could.
Shooting Glass House was something of a performance: I worked holding an array
of color filters and diffusers in one hand while firing the camera with the
other. Though the images look like they were done in Photoshop, very little of
what you see in the photographs was added later.”
The computer in general and Photoshop in particular has
become central to his work since then. His 2014/2015 body of work Choreograph sees
black and white photographs of dancers superimposed upon landscapes and
buildings and then manipulated by Photoshop’s blue, red and green color channels
along with hue/saturation and selective
color filters to create images reminiscent of double exposures in analogue
photography.
For as he says “When I was at Cal Arts [California Institute of the Arts] my ambition
was to create dense objects, works in which many lines of thought converge.
That is still my goal."
thanks this is all interesting since I am a photo artist as well. what I am trying to learn or figure out is how to get a photo image on canvas so that I can paint on it. all the ways I have seen so far are though commercial ways. and are not cost effective. working with a photo them enhancing it digitally is so fun to me, and now that I have played with painting I want to include that as well to create an image but have meaning a message in the art. hum! Smile
ReplyDelete